ox40 (Miltenyi Biotec)
Structured Review

Ox40, supplied by Miltenyi Biotec, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 14 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ox40/product/Miltenyi Biotec
Average 95 stars, based on 14 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Prognostic immunological implications of OX40L expression in the tumor microenvironment of melanoma"
Article Title: Prognostic immunological implications of OX40L expression in the tumor microenvironment of melanoma
Journal: Frontiers in Immunology
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1745742
Figure Legend Snippet: Spatial distribution of OX40L + cells in the melanoma TME. (a) Representative mIF image showing OX40L (green), SOX10 (melanoma nuclei; orange when alone, magenta when overlaid with DAPI), and DAPI (blue). OX40L + cells localize within intratumoral (IT), tumor–stroma margin (TM), and tumor-peripheral (TP) regions. (b) Representative image including OX40 (red), illustrating OX40L + and OX40 + cells in spatial proximity suggestive of receptor–ligand co-localization (white-dashed squares). Right: higher-magnification view of the star-marked area.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: Quantitative analysis of OX40L + and OX40 + cells and their spatial co-localization in melanoma. Multiplex immunofluorescence analysis of OX40L (green), OX40 (red), and DAPI (blue) was performed across 30 melanoma tumors. Quantification was based on 5–10 regions of interest (ROIs; 3 mm² each) per tumor. Co-localization was defined as a distance of <20 μm between OX40 + and OX40L + cells. (a) Total nucleated cell counts (left), OX40L + and OX40 + subpopulation counts (middle), and the corresponding percentages of each subpopulation relative to total cell counts (right) across tumors. Each dot represents the mean value across all ROIs within a single tumor. (b) Percentages of OX40L + cells (green), OX40 + cells (red), and the number of co-localization events normalized to all DAPI + nuclei for individual tumors, ordered by increasing OX40L + frequency. Each dot represents a single ROI. (c) Box plots showing the proportion of OX40L + cells (green) and OX40 + cells (red) within their respective populations that co-localize with the corresponding counterpart. The mean is indicated by a “X” mark and the median by a horizontal line. ***p < 0.001, Student’s t-test.
Techniques Used: Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence
Figure Legend Snippet: Expression of OX40L and OX40 on regulatory T cells in melanoma tumors and peripheral blood of a healthy donor. OX40L and OX40 expression were assessed on Foxp3 + regulatory T cells (Tregs) across 30 melanoma tumors using quantitative multiplex immunofluorescence analysis (10–20 ROIs per tumor; 3 mm² per ROI). (a) Representative images showing Foxp3 + Tregs within a melanoma tumor (Foxp3 + nuclei shown in orange when alone or magenta when overlaid with DAPI) co-expressing OX40L (green), OX40 (red), or both. Right panels show higher-magnification views of circled cells with individual color channels; all panels share the same scale bar, indicated in the DAPI image. (b) Box plots depicting the proportions of OX40L + , OX40 + , and double-positive Tregs across 30 tumors. The mean is indicated by a “X” mark and the median by a horizontal line (***p < 0.001, Student’s t-test). Jittered dots represent the mean value per tumor across ROIs. (c) Box plots showing the prevalence of OX40L + (green), OX40 + (red), and OX40L + /OX40L + double-positive (blue) Tregs per tumor, ordered by OX40L + frequency. Jittered dots represent individual ROIs. (d) Tregs isolated from peripheral blood of a healthy donor were enriched and expanded in vitro under IL-2/CD3/CD28 stimulation. The proportions of OX40L + and OX40 + cells within live, singlet Foxp3 + regulatory T cells, as defined in the Methods, are shown over 13 days of culture.
Techniques Used: Expressing, Multiplex Assay, Immunofluorescence, Isolation, In Vitro
Figure Legend Snippet: Co-expression of OX40 and OX40L with other immune checkpoint proteins (ICPs) in tumor-resident Tregs. Exploratory quantitative mIF analysis of three melanoma tumors (8–15 ROIs per tumor). (a) Box plots showing the proportions of Tregs expressing each ICP (OX40L, OX40, GITR, LAG3, TIM3, and PD1) among all Tregs. Each dot represents one ROI. Statistical comparisons between all groups are summarized in the accompanying table below. (b) Box plots showing the proportions of OX40L + and OX40 + cells within All Tregs, and within GITR + , LAG3 + , TIM3 + , and PD1 + Treg subsets. Each dot represents one ROI. Statistical significance p-values are shown *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.
Techniques Used: Expressing
